Elsevier

Neuropsychologia

Volume 66, January 2015, Pages 126-133
Neuropsychologia

Invited Review
Peripersonal space in the brain

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Peripersonal space (PPS) is the region of space immediately surrounding our bodies.

  • PPS is centered on body parts (i.e., hand-centered, head-centered, and trunk-centered).

  • PPS is subserved by a set of interconnected parietal and frontal regions.

  • PPS is for the interaction with objects and people in the space around us.

Abstract

Research in neuroscience reveals that the brain constructs multiple representation of space. Here, we primarily focus on peripersonal space (PPS) representation, the region of space immediately surrounding our bodies and in which objects can be grasped and manipulated. We review convergent results from several generations of studies, including neurophysiological studies in animals, neuropsychological investigations in monkeys and brain-damaged patients with spatial cognition disorders, as well as recent neuroimaging experiments in neurologically normal individuals. Collectively, these studies show that the primate brain constructs multiple, rapidly modifiable representations of space, centered on different body parts (i.e., hand-centered, head-centered, and trunk-centered), which arise through extensive multisensory interactions within a set of interconnected parietal and frontal regions. PPS representations are pivotal in the sensory guidance of motor behavior, allowing us to interact with objects and, as demonstrated by recent studies, with other people in the space around us.

Introduction

In everyday life, we experience the space around us as a unitary and seamless whole. Yet, a growing body of evidence in contemporary neuroscience reveals that the brain constructs not one but various functionally distinct representations of space. A key division is between near, peripersonal space and far, extrapersonal space representations. This was initially suggested by Brain (1941), who proposed the existence of a grasping distance and a walking distance to explain the selective impairment that right brain-damaged patients may show for one or the other region of space. The notion of a separate representation in the brain for the space immediately around the body was emphasized in subsequent neurophysiological studies (Hyvärinen and Poranen, 1974, Leinonen and Nyman, 1979, Mountcastle, 1976), and substantially elaborated and expanded by Rizzolatti et al., 1981a, Rizzolatti et al., 1981b), who introduced the term peripersonal space to highlight the close links between somatosensory (i.e., bodily) and visual processing exclusively pertaining to this sector of space.

Peripersonal space defines the region of space immediately surrounding our bodies in which objects can be grasped and manipulated. By contrast, extrapersonal space refers to the space beyond grasping distance, in which exploratory eye movements occur. The near vs. far space distinction has been utterly fecund in cognitive psychology and neuroscience, providing a theoretical frame of reference for several targeted studies, both in human and non-human primates, and thence an understanding of how the brain encodes the space around us.

Here, we primarily focus on peripersonal space (PPS), reviewing convergent results from several generation of studies, including neurophysiological studies in animals, neuropsychological investigations in monkeys and brain-damaged patients with spatial cognition disorders, as well as recent neuroimaging experiments in neurologically normal individuals. Collectively, these studies reveal that the primate brain constructs multiple, rapidly modifiable representations of space, centered on different body parts (i.e., hand-centered, head-centered, and trunk-centered), which arise through extensive multisensory interactions within a set of interconnected areas in the parietal and frontal cortex. PPS representations are pivotal in the sensory guidance of motor behavior, allowing us to interact with objects and, as demonstrated by recent studies, with other people near us (Fig. 1, Fig. 2).

Section snippets

Neurophysiological studies of peripersonal space in animals

Discrete processing of PPS was first revealed by single-cell recordings in monkeys, within a network of interconnected sensori-motor areas, such as the parietal and frontal premotor cortices, which are crucial for the control of somatic, head and arm movements (Graziano et al., 1994, Hyvärinen and Poranen, 1974, Rizzolatti et al., 1981a, Rizzolatti et al., 1981b, Gentilucci et al., 1983).

In the macaque monkey, the inferior aspect of the premotor cortex (area 6), particularly its caudal portion

Neuropsychological studies of peripersonal space in monkeys and humans

Studies of the behavioral effects of focal brain lesions have played a critical role in supporting the existence of a selective representation of the space near the body, often employing direct adaptations of animal paradigms, as well as seeking and exploiting homologies. One of the first pieces of empirical evidence for a double dissociation between peripersonal and extrapersonal space came from a study carried out on the frontal cortex of macaques (Rizzolatti et al., 1983). After unilateral

Neuroimaging studies of peripersonal space in humans

A more recent generation of studies has used brain imaging to investigate the anatomical underpinnings and functional mechanisms of PPS in healthy humans. These studies further highlight the homologies between cortical areas explored with single-cell recordings in the monkey and cortical regions in the human brain that are selective for processing objects in the space near us. In their functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, Makin et al. (2007) identified regions within the

Social modulation of peripersonal space

Typically, the study of the PPS, both in human and non-human primates, has involved the use of three-dimensional objects presented near the body and its parts. However, the space close around us is not only the privileged region of space for grasping and manipulating objects but also for interacting with other individuals. Accordingly, a number of recent studies begun to explore how selectively social information can modulate our internal representation of the PPS. In their behavioral study,

The function of peripersonal space representation

What is the function of the PPS representation? Why does the brain construct multiple, body part-centered representations of the space immediately around us? Neurophysiological studies in monkey have revealed that neurons in the putamen, area VIP, and inferior area 6 have motor functions as well as multisensory functions (Rizzolatti et al., 1997). In humans, studies using single-pulse TMS have shown that auditory (Serino et al., 2009, Avenanti et al., 2012) or visual (Makin et al., 2009)

Conclusions

We have provided an inevitably limited review of the studies into the neural and functional mechanisms underlying the representation of PPS in the brain, both in humans and monkeys. Since its introduction, the concept of a segregated representation of the space near the body, i.e., the space within grasping distance, has been an important source of several ideas and experiments. We have reviewed converging evidence from several generations of studies, including neurophysiological research in

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. Brianna Beck for her help in editing the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Ministero Istruzione Università e Ricerca (PRIN 2010, protocol number: 2010XPMFW4_009) awarded to GdP, and from the University of Bologna (FARB 2014, protocol number: RFBO120993) awarded to Elisabetta Làdavas.

References (83)

  • T. Heed et al.

    Others' actions reduce crossmodal integration in peripersonal space

    Curr. Biol.

    (2010)
  • E. Làdavas

    Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space

    Trends Cognit. Sci.

    (2002)
  • E. Macaluso et al.

    Multisensory spatial interactions: a window onto functional integration in the human brain

    Trends Neurosci.

    (2005)
  • A. Maravita et al.

    Reaching with a tool extends visual–tactile interactions into far space: Evidence from cross-modal extinction

    Neuropsychologia

    (2001)
  • A. Maravita et al.

    Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans

    Cognition

    (2002)
  • A. Maravita et al.

    Tools for the body (schema)

    Trends Cognit. Sci.

    (2004)
  • D.J. Quinlan et al.

    fMRI reveals a preference for near viewing in the human parietooccipital cortex

    Neuroimage

    (2007)
  • G. Rizzolatti et al.

    Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1981)
  • G. Rizzolatti et al.

    Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys: I. Somatosensory responses

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1981)
  • G. Rizzolatti et al.

    Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macque monkeys: II. Visual responses

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1981)
  • C. Teneggi et al.

    Social modulation of peripersonal space boundaries

    Curr. Biol.

    (2013)
  • Andersen, R.A., 1987. Inferior parietal lobule function in spatial perception and visuomotor integration. In: Plum, F.,...
  • M.B. Bender

    Disorders in Perception: with Particular Reference to the Phenomena of Extinction and Displacement

    (1952)
  • A. Berti et al.

    When far becomes near: remapping of space by tool use

    J. Cognit. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • M. Botvinick et al.

    Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see

    Nature

    (1998)
  • W.R. Brain

    Visual disorientation with special reference to lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere

    Brain

    (1941)
  • C. Brozzoli et al.

    fMRI adaptation reveals a cortical mechanism for the coding of space near the hand

    J. Neurosci.

    (2011)
  • C. Brozzoli et al.

    Peripersonal space: multisensory interface for body–object interactions

  • C. Brozzoli et al.

    Multisensory representation of the space near the hand: from perception to action and interindividual interactions

    Neuroscientist

    (2014)
  • C. Cavada et al.

    Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: II. Evidence for segregated corticocortical networks linking sensory and limbic areas with the frontal lobe

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1989)
  • Y.E. Cohen et al.

    A common reference frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • C.L. Colby et al.

    Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: anatomic location and visual response properties

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1993)
  • G. di Pellegrino et al.

    Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1992)
  • G. di Pellegrino et al.

    Seeing where your hands are

    Nature

    (1997)
  • G. di Pellegrino et al.

    Spatial extinction on double asynchronous stimulation

    Neuropsychologia

    (1997)
  • J.R. Duhamel et al.

    Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1998)
  • H.H. Ehrsson et al.

    That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb

    Science

    (2004)
  • A. Farnè et al.

    Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use

    NeuroReport

    (2000)
  • A. Farnè et al.

    Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand

    Brain

    (2000)
  • A. Farnè et al.

    Auditory peripersonal space in humans

    J. Cognit. Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • A. Farnè et al.

    Neuropsychological evidence of modular organization of the near peripersonal space

    Neurology

    (2005)
  • Cited by (184)

    • The sense of agency in near and far space

      2024, Consciousness and Cognition
    • Evolutionary perspective on peripersonal space and perception

      2023, Cognitive Archaeology, Body Cognition, and the Evolution of Visuospatial Perception
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text